Tribe Verified

Upholding Democracy & Free Speech

byKaruna NundyPractices at Supreme Court & Delhi High Court; Consultations across NCRStarts from1,75,000 Per SessionView full gallery

Defending the right to dissent, protest, and speak without fear is at the core of my practice. These cases are not just legal battles; they are fights for our constitutional fabric and the rights we are born with.

The Preamble to our Constitution is a declaration of our collective resolve. On Republic Day and every day, I am reminded of how far these rights have brought us, and the continued struggle required to protect and realize them for every citizen.

The Constitution must be followed not just in courtrooms, but on the streets where police march, in government offices that permit pollution, and in the highest seats of power. Its principles must be lived daily.

The rights to a decent life, equality, and dignity are inherent to our humanity. I devote my life to realizing the Constitution because it codifies these birthrights, which exist even if the text itself were to be changed.

The results of our collective democratic will have exposed the house of cards propped up by opaque electoral funding and compromised institutions. This is a testament to the daring and resolve of those who kept the faith.

The fight for our democracy is inspiring, even when the odds are long and our institutions have been damaged. I offer my strength and support to democrats everywhere, both within and outside the political arena, who show such courage.

When the Prime Minister engages in speech that violates criminal laws on hate speech and election laws, it is a direct assault on our constitutional fabric. I believe the Election Commission must be held accountable for its inaction.

A graphic from Bolta Hindustan quoting my question about the Election Commission's silence on hate speech by the Prime Minister. Public accountability is crucial for upholding the rule of law.

During a television debate on the UAPA charge against Arundhati Roy, I argued that the case is a face saving device by the government. With the Supreme Court having stayed all sedition cases, this 14 year late charge is legally untenable.

As a lawyer for AIB after their roast, I learned that while a tasteless joke is fleeting, a registered FIR is not. Criminal complaints are often filed for publicity, a misuse of the legal process that I frequently challenge.

In cases concerning free speech, I have argued that older Supreme Court judgments like Ramji Lal Modi should be declared per incuriam, or wrong, in light of later, more nuanced decisions. Obscenity laws are often too broad and misused.

About Upholding Democracy & Free Speech

When challenging charges like sedition or UAPA, timing is everything. Because arrests often follow news cycles, I prioritize the immediate quashing of FIRs and securing interim relief. We do not just wait for the court; we identify the procedural flaws in the state's case to stop the process before it disrupts your life.

Similar work from other experts

Browse through Curated picks from other experts on mytribe