Tribe Verified

Freedom of Speech vs. The Law: Knowing Your Legal Boundaries

byAbha SinghAvailable online; Travels across India for events & consults at Fort, MumbaiStarts from₹50,000 per session (up to 90 mins)View full gallery

Freedom of expression is not absolute. I examine the fine line between your right to speak and the laws regarding public decency and digital content.

Speaking to PTI, I comment on the Supreme Court's strong observations against stand-up comedian Ranveer Allahbadia. While the court granted him protection, it rightly condemned his "dirty and perverse" jokes, reinforcing that freedom of speech does not give one the license to vomit vulgarity in a public space.

In this interview, I break down the legal sections filed against YouTuber Ranveer Allahbadia, including Section 67 of the IT Act for transmitting obscene material and sections of the BNS for violating the modesty of a woman. While the sections are strong, cooperation with the police investigation is key.

A clip from an interview where I discuss the delicate balance between freedom (Azaadi) and the law (Kanoon). True freedom comes with responsibility.

My quote featured in the Free Press Journal on International Human Rights Day. I am truly free only when I can speak my mind without the threat of persecution and live without discrimination.

An informational post from my foundation, Rann Samar, detailing the accusations against influencers for degrading the family system and hurting religious sentiments.

This graphic explains the controversial remarks that sparked legal action against Ranveer Allahbadia and others, igniting a debate on online content.

An overview of the controversy, where a YouTuber faced public and legal backlash for a question posed on a show.

This post lists the specific legal sections under the BNS 2023 and IT Act 2000 invoked in the FIR, including the Indecent Representation of Women Act.

The aftermath of the controversy, including a public apology and the ensuing debate on OTT censorship versus selective outrage.

About Freedom of Speech vs. The Law

Many people mistake the internet for a lawless space, but recent FIRs against public figures prove otherwise. When you publish content, you are bound by specific laws like the IT Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). I don’t just offer opinions; I break down exactly which sections—such as Section 67 regarding obscenity or laws on the indecent representation of women—come into play when a line is crossed.

Expert in national media legal debates. — Approved by the tribe
A

Abha Singh

Available online; Travels across India for events & consults at Fort, MumbaiStarts from ₹50,000 per session (up to 90 mins)

I moved from civil service to the courtroom because I refuse to watch the system fail, especially when the law is used as a weapon against the vulnerable. My work isn't just about winning cases; it's about holding power accountable and ensuring the law remains a tool for protection.

Similar work from other experts

Browse through Curated picks from other experts on mytribe

4

Cyber Law and Digital Safety Awareness

P
Prachi PratapOnline programs available; Conducts workshops across India
Sharing lessons learned from representing AIB after the roast. The case highlighted the vulnerability of artists to criminal complaints and the critical need for robust protection of free speech, even for tasteless jokes.8
A technical legal point on criminal procedure. In cases involving cognizable offences, the risk of arrest is high, making the pursuit of quashing and interim relief an urgent priority for the accused.
My legal opinion on the Supreme Court's judgment in Ramji Lal Modi. I argue that the precedent should be declared per incuriam, or wrong, as it is inconsistent with later decisions and contributes to an overly broad application of obscenity laws.
A reflection on Constitution Day. The Constitution must be followed not just in courtrooms, but on the streets, in government offices, and in the highest seats of power.

Constitutional Law and Free Speech Advocacy

K
Karuna NundyAvailable online; Travels across India for speaking engagements
This post explains the protection available under Section 354D of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which criminalizes stalking both online and physically. It advises victims to provide evidence like messages and emails to the police.11
A duplicate of the slide on IPC Section 354D, reinforcing the primary legal protection against stalking in India.
This graphic details the specific protections against cyberstalking under the Information Technology Act, 2000. It highlights Sections 66E and 67, which address the non-consensual sharing of private images and obscene material.
A duplicate of the post explaining cyberstalking provisions under the IT Act, ensuring users are aware of these important digital safety laws.

Legal Rights Against Online Stalking & Harassment

P
Prateek ChandramouliOnline consultations; Office in Seshadripuram, Bengaluru & takes cases across India
On the sets of the ITV Network. I use media appearances as a platform to educate the public on their legal rights and current legal issues.12
A promotional graphic for my appearance on the "Hum Mahilaein" show on India News. I am passionate about discussing and advocating for women's rights.
On the set of "Hum Mahilaein" at India News. It is a privilege to be part of conversations that empower women with legal knowledge.

Legal Awareness & Public Commentary

K
Kanika BhardwajOnline consultations available; Represents clients across India; Office in Greater Kailash I, New Delhi
7
The Supreme Court hearing on the breach of privilege notice against Arnab Goswami was a pivotal moment for press freedom. It highlighted the tension between legislative privileges and the fundamental right to report and comment on matters of public interest.
As part of a news panel, I provided my legal perspective on the Supreme Court's suo motu cognizance of the COVID-19 crisis. These discussions are vital for public understanding of how the highest court exercises its constitutional authority to protect citizens' right to life and health.
The Prashant Bhushan contempt case sparked a national conversation about the scope of contempt law in India. My view is that while the judiciary must be respected, the law should not be used to stifle constructive criticism or calls for accountability.

Defending Fundamental Rights and Media Freedom

K
Kapil SankhlaOffice in Greater Kailash I, New Delhi; Represents clients across India
6

Legal Fact-Checks: Decoding Laws Behind Viral News

T
The One Minute LawyerAvailable online, across India, and at Janakpuri office

More from Public Speaking & Media Advocacy by Abha Singh

FeaturedOn The National Stage: Media Debates & Legal CommentaryAdvocacy for Women's Rights & Gender JusticeEngaging with the Next GenerationDriving Change Through Public Interest Litigation & Civic ActionAwards, Recognition & Published ArticlesLegal Insights: Know Your RightsBehind the ScenesEvents, Networking & Personal Moments

More services by Abha Singh

Litigation & Dispute ResolutionSocial Justice Advocacy
  1. Home
  2. Abha Singh
  3. Public Speaking & Media Advocacy
  4. Freedom of Speech vs. The Law