Tribe Verified

Matrimonial & Family Law Defense

byRhythmSheel SrivastavaOnline consultations available; Office in Tilak Nagar, New Delhi; Represents clients across IndiaStarts from55,000 per bail application (till disposal)View full gallery

Matrimonial disputes take an immense mental toll, but they do not have to define your future. I focus on evidence-based defense, specifically challenging false 498A charges and ensuring fair maintenance outcomes.

Understanding Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act is crucial for maintenance claims. I explain why filing an income affidavit and bank statements is a non-negotiable step for the court to determine a fair maintenance amount.

On News18, I discussed the harsh reality and misuse of matrimonial laws like Section 498A. It is disheartening to see false cases leading to immense mental and financial distress, and I am committed to fighting this injustice.

After a 13-year battle, we achieved a huge success by getting 10 family members discharged in a false 498A case. This win, acknowledged by journalist Deepika Narayan Bhardwaj, shows that with persistence, truth prevails.

A victory featured in the Times of India. The court acquitted my client and his family in a dowry case after the prosecution failed to produce witnesses, proving the allegations were unsubstantiated.

The case, initiated in 2011, involved serious allegations of dowry demands and cruelty. This clipping from the Times of India outlines the initial complaint we fought against for over a decade.

My argument, as reported by the Times of India, was that a husband has a basic right to live with dignity. This right was infringed by frivolous legal proceedings without any evidence.

The court took note of my submission that the case had dragged on for 14 years without specific allegations. This highlights my strategy of focusing on procedural lapses and lack of evidence to win a case.

The complainant alleged misappropriation of articles but failed to appear in court to testify. This was a key factor in the prosecution's failure to establish its case.

This news clipping shows the final outcome: acquittal. The court stated the case remained unestablished because the complainant and witnesses chose not to depose despite ample opportunities.

The court concluded that the prosecution "miserably failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt" for offences under Section 498-A, 406, and 34 of the IPC. A clear win based on facts.

About Matrimonial & Family Law

Filing for maintenance under Section 24 requires more than just a simple application. If you fail to include your income affidavit and verified bank statements, the court cannot properly assess your financial needs. Do not let procedural oversights stall your relief; get your financial disclosures accurate and complete before the first hearing.

Similar work from other experts

Browse through Curated picks from other experts on mytribe