Tribe Verified

Legal Help for Trapped Homebuyers in Subvention Schemes

byANG PartnersTakes cases across India; Visit office in Panchsheel Enclave, New DelhiStarts from15,000 per notice drafted & servedView full gallery

If you are stuck in an 80-20 or subvention scheme where the builder took your loan but never finished the home, you are not alone. Banks and builders often work in collusion, but there are legal ways to freeze coercive recovery actions and protect your credit score.

In this NDTV India interview, I explain the mechanics of subvention schemes where builders and banks work together, leaving the homebuyer trapped. The money goes directly to the builder, construction stalls, and the bank starts pursuing the buyer for loan recovery.

A detailed discussion with Jayashree Kurup on the history and legal challenges of subvention schemes. I explain how we use RBI and National Housing Board circulars, which actually ban such upfront loan disbursals, to build strong cases for homebuyers in the High Court.

A quote from my interview with Moneycontrol where I describe how builders use subvention schemes for 'profile funding'. Instead of taking corporate loans, they use the CIBIL ratings of individual buyers to get personal loans and then default, leaving buyers with no home and a massive debt.

This is a Delhi High Court order from one of our cases. It documents the court's initial observation that the homebuyer was "taken for a ride" by the builder and the bank, leading to a stay on recovery proceedings initiated by the bank.

The continuation of the High Court order, where the judges stayed the proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT). This demonstrates how we can halt bank actions while the larger issue of builder fraud is addressed.

About Trapped in Builder-Bank Schemes?

The biggest panic point for most of my clients is receiving a recovery notice from the bank while the property remains a ghost site. My priority is usually filing a writ petition in the High Court to secure an immediate 'no coercive action' order. This is not just about delaying the EMI; it is about shifting the liability back to the builder and stopping the bank from reporting your account as an NPA (Non-Performing Asset) or hurting your CIBIL score while the dispute is ongoing.

Similar work from other experts

Browse through Curated picks from other experts on mytribe