Tribe Verified

Criminal Defence and Litigation Services

byLaw Offices of Vivek Tanwar & AssociatesOffice in Gurugram; Handles cases across Delhi NCR and IndiaStarts from800 per sessionView full gallery

Navigating the complexities of criminal law requires a strategic, evidence-based approach to protect your rights. We provide dedicated advocacy across trials, bail hearings, and appeals, focusing on rigorous procedural analysis to build your defence.

The Punjab & Haryana High Court held that recovering contraband in a transparent bag does not, by itself, establish the innocence of the accused or police misconduct. In NDPS cases, we analyze every detail of the seizure and investigation process to build a strong defence.

The Supreme Court has affirmed that vague allegations against local police are not sufficient grounds to transfer a case to the CBI. We ensure that any request for a change in investigating agency is backed by credible evidence of bias or incompetence.

The Supreme Court has ruled that individuals who abscond or evade warrants, especially in serious economic offences, are not entitled to anticipatory bail. We advise our clients on the importance of cooperating with legal proceedings to preserve their right to seek bail.

In a rape-murder case involving a minor, the Punjab & Haryana High Court commuted a death sentence to life imprisonment, ruling it did not fall into the 'rarest of rare' category. We meticulously argue against capital punishment by presenting all mitigating factors.

The Delhi High Court permitted a DNA test even at the final arguments stage of a decade-old murder case, emphasizing the importance of independent scientific evidence. We leverage forensic advancements to strengthen our cases, ensuring all avenues for justice are explored.

The Punjab & Haryana High Court has dismissed a protection plea for a live-in couple involving a minor. We navigate the complexities of cases involving minors, ensuring legal safeguards and the child's welfare are prioritized.

The Supreme Court has clarified that a delay in recording witness statements under Section 161/164 CrPC is not fatal to the prosecution's case if there is an adequate explanation. We scrutinize such delays to challenge the credibility of witness testimonies.

The Delhi High Court granted bail to a car owner in an NDPS case, finding no evidence that he knowingly allowed his vehicle to be used for transporting ganja. We focus on proving the absence of "conscious possession" or knowledge, a key element in drug-related offences.

The Punjab & Haryana High Court has ruled that an FIR for abetment to suicide cannot be quashed based on a compromise, as it is an offence against society. We advise clients that serious, non-compoundable offences cannot be settled privately.

A Magistrate cannot direct FIR registration under Section 156(3) CrPC if the complainant has not first approached the police under Sections 154(1) and 154(3). We ensure procedural compliance is challenged to prevent misuse of the legal process.

About Criminal Defence & Litigation

Whether you are dealing with an FIR registration issue or fighting for bail, we do not rely on generic arguments. For example, in our recent work on NDPS Act cases, we focus specifically on the evidentiary gaps in the recovery process rather than just pleading innocence. This approach allows us to engage with the actual procedural flaws in the prosecution case, which is often where the difference between a remand and release lies.

Find specific legal support

Search for the type of case or legal service you need.

More from Litigation & Dispute Resolution by Law Offices of Vivek Tanwar & Associates

More services by Law Offices of Vivek Tanwar & Associates