Tribe Verified

Legal Insights & Current Affairs for Law Students

byArchana Rahul SinghOnline sessions available; In-person mentorship and field visits across Delhi NCRStarts from500 per sessionView full gallery

The law is constantly evolving. From the shift to the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita to critical Supreme Court rulings, stay updated with the legal precedents that actually shape daily practice in Delhi courts.

An important update for all law students and professionals. The three new criminal laws, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, have come into force from July 1, 2024.

A newspaper clipping detailing the replacement of old IPC sections with the new 'Dafa' under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. It is crucial to be familiar with these changes.

A summary of two landmark judgments from 2025, U. Sudheera vs. C. Yashoda and Rajiv Ghosh vs. Satya Narain Jaiswal. Understanding case law is fundamental to legal practice.

An analysis of the Kim Wansoo vs. State of Uttar Pradesh case. This judgment highlights how criminal law must not be misused to settle civil disputes, a key ethical principle for advocates.

The case of Vihaan Kumar vs. The State of Haryana underscores the mandatory requirement to inform an arrested person of the grounds for arrest under Article 22(1) of the Constitution.

A significant judgment in Rina Kumari vs. Dinesh Kumar Mahto, where the Supreme Court upheld a wife's right to maintenance even if she refuses to comply with a decree for restitution of conjugal rights due to just cause.

A video compilation of landmark judgments from the first half of 2025, covering key legal precedents and their implications.

The title card for a series on landmark judgments from January to June 2025. Keeping abreast of recent judicial pronouncements is a continuous process.

An overview of Section 70(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which prescribes life imprisonment or the death sentence for the gang rape of victims under 18.

A video graphic explaining the stringent punishments under Section 70(2) of the BNS for heinous crimes against minors.

About Legal Insights & Current Affairs

The biggest challenge in law isn't just reading the statutes; it's understanding the 'why' behind the courtroom decisions. When I break down a case like Kim Wansoo vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, I focus on the procedural error regarding Article 226, not just the final outcome. This ensures you understand how to use these precedents to shield your clients from vexatious litigation, rather than just memorizing facts for an exam.

Find specific legal guidance

Search for landmark judgments, procedural updates, or career advice.

More services by Archana Rahul Singh