The Fight for Gender-Neutral Justice

In this video, my colleague Advocate Ritu Rawat discusses laws that are exclusively for women, such as Section 498A and the Domestic Violence Act. It raises the important question of why there are no corresponding provisions to protect men from similar abuse.

Here, Advocate Ritu Rawat critiques the new Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS), which introduces Section 69 to punish men for making false promises of marriage. The law is not gender-neutral and fails to recognize that women can also make false promises.

This video further analyzes Section 69 of the BNS, arguing that it promotes immorality. If a woman has sex in exchange for a promise of a job, the law only punishes the man, ignoring the transactional and potentially illegal nature of the act itself.

A critical look at the loopholes in Section 69 of the BNS. The law punishes a man for a "false promise" of a job, but implicitly suggests that if the promise was true and the job was given, the sexual exchange would be acceptable. This is a dangerous precedent.

This video points out a major gap in the new BNS: the removal of Section 377 of the IPC without a replacement. This effectively decriminalizes forced homosexual acts, leaving male victims of sexual assault without any legal recourse.

A compilation of one-sided court judgments, such as allowing a cheating wife to claim maintenance or forcing a husband to support a wife who earns more than him. These rulings highlight the urgent need for a more balanced and gender-neutral approach in our judiciary.

This video shows a man who was deceived into marrying a woman who had a history of filing false cases for extortion. It's a real-life example of how men can become victims of legal manipulation, a reality our laws often ignore.

A short, humorous clip pointing out the double standards in society and law. A man questions why he is expected to show respect when the legal system itself often fails to provide equal protection and dignity to men.

From Savitri Phule and Fatima Sheikh in 1848 to women in the armed forces today, this image celebrates the progress of women. My fight for gender-neutral laws is not against women; it is for true equality, where justice and opportunity are available to all, regardless of gender.